May 29, 2022

Naughty Books

Naughty But Law & Legal

FTC asks for court docket support in acquiring L.A. legislation organization to turn above docs

Signage is noticed at the Federal Trade Fee headquarters in Washington, D.C., U.S., August 29, 2020. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly

  • FTC says Manatt, Phelps & Phillips gained $704,000 payment from alleged rip-off artist Robert Zangrillo
  • Manatt represented Zangrillo’s business enterprise lover
  • FTC desires equally partners held in civil contempt for on the net strategies

The organization and law business names revealed higher than are produced instantly primarily based on the text of the short article. We are strengthening this attribute as we continue to test and acquire in beta. We welcome feed-back, which you can provide employing the feed-back tab on the appropriate of the website page.

(Reuters) – The Federal Trade Fee is inquiring a federal decide to pressure a Los Angeles-based mostly business to transform about its documents relating to a $704,000 payment an alleged scam artist made in 2014.

In a submitting manufactured Thursday in Manhattan federal court, the FTC alleged that Manatt, Phelps & Phillips has refused to turn over information relating to a payment it obtained from Robert Zangrillo, who allegedly served operate a sequence of internet websites that purported to offer governing administration companies.

Manatt, in accordance to the FTC, represented Zangrillo’s business lover, Burton Katz, but not Zangrillo. Katz arrived at a settlement with the FTC in 2014 about a phone bill-cramming scam he allegedly led that resulted in people finding strike with unauthorized costs on their cellphone costs.

The FTC is striving to hold Zangrillo, Katz and other people in civil contempt for allegedly working a “sprawling online scheme” that bilked customers out of their funds and private data by websites that purportedly give effortless obtain to government companies, in violation of the 2014 settlement.

Manatt’s handling partner, Donna Wilson, did not respond to a request for remark. Zangrillo’s communications with Manatt “go to the coronary heart of his contempt, popular business, and personal liability defenses,” the FTC alleged in its Thursday filing.

A individual federal choose explained the web-sites, e.g., and, allegedly run by Katz and Zangrillo’s On Level International LLC, as “patently misleading” in a January 2020 preliminary injunction.

In letters to the FTC, Manatt argued that the federal agency’s report ask for was as well burdensome for the agency to meet up with, one thing the FTC argues in opposition to in its filing.

Associates for the FTC also did not answer to requests for comment.

The case is Federal Trade Commission v. Manatt, Phelps & Phillips LLP, U.S. District Court docket for the Southern District of New York, 1:21-mc-00466.